This is an outdated version published on 2024-11-27. Read the most recent version.

Non-invasive cardiac output measurement of assisted and spontaneously breathing patients by means of partial CO2 rebreathing.

DOI: 10.36210/BerMedJ/epub27112024

Authors

Abstract

: In the partial carbon dioxide rebreathing method, cardiac output (CV) is proportional to the change in CO2 elimination divided by the change in end-tidal CO2 as a result of a rebreathing period. This measurement principle has so far made it impossible to specifically determine the HRV in past studies during spontaneous breathing and assisted spontaneous breathing. The advantages of NICO™ compared to invasive methods are the continuous measurement of end-tidal CO2 concentrations and the resulting possibility of determining dead space ventilation (VD/VT), alveolar ventilation (MValv), the measurement of effective pulmonary blood flow (PCBF) as well as the determination of the pulmonary blood flow. blood flow (PCBF) and the determination of VCO2 and VO2. For the study, 45 patients requiring intensive care with existing invasive monitoring (PiCCO, CCO) and assisted ventilation (BIPAP ASB, SIMV) or assisted spontaneous breathing (ASB, CPAP) via a horizontal endotracheal tube were recruited. NICO™ monitoring with NICO CO2 loop flow sensor, NICO sensor with rebreathing valve and monitor was provided by hesto med Lichtenstein and Respironics® Germany. At the same time, the microcirculation parameters (SO2, flow, velocity) were measured at a tissue depth of 3 and 7 mm using LEA O2C laser Doppler flow spectrometry. The cardiac output determined by CO2 rebreathing correlates with the invasively determined cardiac output (6.15±1.83 l/min vs. 6.73±1.70 l/min; Pearson=0.66, R2= 0.43; p>0.1). The measured CO2 output correlates with the end-expiratory tidal volume (268±68.08 ml vs.187.48 ±76.75 ml; Pearson =0.35; R2=0.13) and end-expiratory CO2 (32.74±5.02 mmHg; Pearson=0.45, R2=0.2) and is dependent on ventilation-perfusion mismatch (VQI =25.93±8.61%) and dead space ventilation (TRV=58.8±49.29 ml). The factors of CO2 production (VCO2) have an influence on the subcutaneous oxygen saturation (SO2P1S; Pearson=0.4) and on the blood flow (Flow P1S) in 3 mm tissue depth (Pearson=0.5) as well as on the blood flow (Flow P1D) in 7 mm tissue depth (Pearson=0.3). The pulmonary capillary blood flow (PCBF) has a negative correlation to the subcutaneous oxygen saturation (SO2P1S; -0.3) and the blood flow (Flow P1D) in the tissue layer of 7 mm (Flow; -0.4). There is no influence of the determined cardiac output on microperfusion. The NICO CO2 rebreathing method thus proves to be a suitable instrument for the continuous monitoring of spontaneously or assisted breathing patients. A correlation of the parameters determined in the NICO system and the measured parameters of the microcirculation (O2C) can be found from VCO2 subcutaneous oxygen saturation and blood flow as well as pulmonary blood flow (PCBF) to subcutaneous oxygen saturation and deep tissue blood flow (FlowP1D).

Nicht invasives Cardiac Output-NICO

Published

2024-11-27 — Updated on 2024-11-27

Versions

How to Cite

Schedler, O. (2024). Non-invasive cardiac output measurement of assisted and spontaneously breathing patients by means of partial CO2 rebreathing.: DOI: 10.36210/BerMedJ/epub27112024. Berlin Medical Journal, 6(1). Retrieved from https://bmjs.me/index.php/BMJ/article/view/48

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>